THOUGHT FOR THE DAY (30th)
Tommo The Terrible Tipster
89 tips, 72 losers. On Sunday 17th June 2001. The Observer newspaper monitored Derek Thompson’s premium rate tipping line for 4 weeks. The exercise resulted in Thompson making a loss of £1846.05. The call costs were £75.32 making an overall loss of £1921.37 including call charges. Thompson had 17 winners, 14 of which were 3-1 or less. 5 were odds on. Thompson is on record as saying “never bet odds on – it’s as simple as that” On the 11th of May 2001, he tipped two 4-6 odds on shots which both lost. Thompson later said “If people don’t like the service, don’t ring”
Typical Tommo con talk. How much do you have to pay and lose on his tips before you find out you don’t like them? Think about that one!!
--------------------------------------------------
THOUGHT FOR THE DAY (29th)
THE RACING POST SEZ:-
“Mr. Thompson's adverts reflect his recent performance prior to the advert “
Derek Thompson had a 12-1 winner on the 2nd of December……… His results for December were so poor that he carried on gloating and boasting the 12-1 winner until January………4th, 4 weeks after he tipped it!!
Is that what the Racing Post mean by “RECENT PERFORMANCE PRIOR TO HIS ADVERT??”…..A horse that he tipped 4 weeks ago?
(in his website he boasts about a winner he gave 3 years ago..Kinnaird!!!!)
So what comes next from Thompson? Will his adverts contain winners “prior” to 2008? ….. Perhaps The Racing Post would pass comment as to whether the word “prior” relates to a horse that won 4 weeks ago. But they won't. The opposite of the words prior is 'since' …. So how about Derek Thompson telling us how many losers he's had 'since’ he had the 12-1 winner on the 2nd of December!
It’s all so very one sided isn't it?
---------------------------------------------------
.
THOUGHT FOR THE DAY (27th Jan)
Below is a word for word extract taken from the Racing Post on the 12rh December 2008
"According to the OLBG data, since he began in March 2008 Tommo has yet to record a single winning month. He was £11,359 down and this despite putting in all that leg-work on the Newmarket gallops, rain or shine"
£11,359 LOSS
10 LOSING MONTHS
£100 stake
And Wikipidia removed a post saying Thompson was a hopeless racing tipster
Think about it
-------------------------------------------------
THE RACING POST SEZ:-
“All information carried within the adverts conform with all Advertising Standards guidelines for sports tipster service, as is with all tipster ads carried in the Racing Post.”
PhonepayPlus sez:-………….PhonepayPlus guidelines require that….“No misleading claims are made in the promotion” .
I sez:- The mere fact that the advert only contains winners and no losers is misleading to the reader. The advert misleads by omission. The omission of the tipster’s losers denies the reader the knowledge of the tipster’s losers. The tipster conceals the losers from the reader with intent to deceive and mislead
FACT
-----------------------------------------------
THOUGHT FOR THE DAY (u/d 24th Jan)
You see that pile of crap that I've just dumped down under? Well Thompson is charging £1 per minute for the service where that crap comes from......He does love stretching does't he? .... What do you think it means? .... Well It don't take much working out does it. He is almost certainly losing mega-bucks this month .... OR!..... He;s got wind that I'm asking questions from the regulater and he is trying to show that he does not boast winners from 3 years ago!!!!..... Like what he does on his website! That's gonna take some explaining!!!
24th Jan ....."I've got my ear to the ground"
23rd Jan ....."I've got my ear to the ground"
22nd Jan .....“I’ve got my ear to the ground"
21st Jan .... “I’ve got my ear to the ground”
20th Jan .....“I’ve got my ear to the ground”
19th Jan......“I’ve got my ear to the ground
18th Jan .....“I’ve got my ear to the ground
17th Jan .....“I’ve got my ear to the ground”
16th Jan......“I’ve got my ear to the ground”
15th Jan......“I’ve got my ear to the ground”
14th Jan......"I've got my ear to the ground"
Instead of all that repetetive rubbish, why don't you tell us how you are doing Thompson? .... Are we not allowed to know?.....Are your stats so bad that you hide and conceal them so you can trick and con with yer 'winners only' racket.....Of course you do Thompson....Of coarse you do!...... By the way! I may see you at Windsor Thompson!....Watch out for the dodderin' old git with a zimmer frame and listen out for him!....He might be a dodderin' old git Thompson.....But he's got a good mouth on him!!!!....Gerrit?
Think about it!
------------------------------------------------
THOUGHT FOR THE DAY (24th Jan)
Below is an extract from an old postof mine. Last night I went through Thompson website and found an even better stretch. Kinnaird 33-1 but Thompson gloated that 70-1 was available.
I checked the horse out and found out that it did win at 33-1 IN OCTOBER 2005!!!!
And today would you believe WIKIPEDA has updated Thompson's entry by saying he misleads, stretches and is a hopeless racing tipster. Check it out. POWER TO THE PUNTER!!!
THE RACING POST SEZ:-
“Mr. Thompson's adverts reflect his recent performance prior to the advert “
Derek Thompson had a 12-1 winner on the 4th December……….. His results for December were so poor that he carried on gloating and boasting the 12-1 winner until January……….. 4 weeks after he tipped it!!
Is that what the Racing Post mean by “RECENT PERFORMANCE PRIOR TO HIS ADVERT??”.....A horse that he tipped 4 weeks ago?
So what comes next from Thompson? Will his adverts contain winners “prior” to 2008? ..... Perhaps The Racing Post would pass comment as to whether the word “prior” relates to a horse that won 4 weeks ago. But they won't. The opposite of the words prior is 'since' …. So how about Derek Thompson telling us how many losers he's had 'since’ he had the 12-1 winner on the 4th of December!
It’s all so very one sided isn't it?
-------------------------------------------
Massive apologies for missing out on the 22nd and 23rd but have been so busy with me cause and me computer probs has been bad.
Got a brain geezer coming round today to sort me probs out.
There will be no further 'miss out' re 'Thought for the day!)... I hope!
-------------------------------------------.
THOUGHT FOR THE DAY (21st Jan)
EVEN THE RACING POST ADMIT THOMPSON IS USELESS
AS PROOFED BY THE RACING POST!!!!!!!!!!!
AS PROOFED BY THE RACING POST!!!!!!!!!!!
AS PROOFED BY THE RACING POST!!!!!!!!!!!!
On the 12rh Dec, an article appeared in the Racing Post regarding Derek Thompson's ability to tip horses. Below is an extract from that article.
"Judging by the evidence at the 'On Line Betting Guide' means that Derek Thompson is in real danger of becoming the most hirsute man ever to wield a pin.
Earlier this month, Tommo took the plunge and joined in the fun at the betting portal (OLBG), posting his selections in the sites vibrant tipster competition, and running a blog to share his thoughts on the punting process
It was a bold move for any punter, putting one's powers to the test in such a public way. I had a go myself once, and my toes still curl involuntary at the memory.
But for a professional tipster who already gets generous portions of flack, and was once bested in public by a small dog, Tommo's decision to enter the arena was a mighty testament to British pluck.
I'm sorry to say, that having waited as long as I dare to allow for statistical anomalies, the results (Thompson's)have been poor reward for his dauntless spirit of adventure
According to the OLBG data, since he began in March 2008 Tommo has yet to record a single winning month. He was £11,359 down and this dispite putting in all that leg-work on the Newmarket gallops, rain or shine"
------------------------------------
And that gentlemen is an article written in The Racing Post on the 12th December.
The highlights are mine.
I believe that Derek Thompson is currently running three (090) tipping lines and a subscription service.....Every single one of them is making astronomical losses similar to the article above.
Why does the Racing Post still allow him to carry on cheating the vulnerable out of their money with his prven massive losses n all his tipping lines?
-------------------------------------------------
THOUGHT FOR THE DAY (20th Jan)
HONESTY
It is written within the scriptures of Ofcom that “The code of practice for premium rate services and 090 numbers is designed to set and maintain standards aimed at ensuring decency and honesty of such services”
Now let me explain the meaning of the word….. HONESTY.
Honesty means:- showing uprightness and fairness: (as in honest dealings) …. Gained or obtained fairly: (as in honest wealth) …. sincere; frank: …. genuine or unadulterated: …. having a good reputation: (as in an honest name) ….truthful or creditable …. humble, plain, or unadorned …. archaic. chaste; virtuous ….. honorable in principles, intentions, and actions; (As in upright and fair) (As in an honest person)
Does an advert that tricks, misleads by omission and deceives show uprightness and fairness? I think not!
Is not an advert that tricks, misleads and deceives and then takes payment unfairly, not an advert that reaps dishonest wealth? I think it is!!!
Is an advert that tricks, misleads and deceives a sincere and frank advert? I think not!
Is an advert that tricks, misleads and deceives a genuine and unadulterated advert? I think not!
Does the author of an advert that misleads. tricks and deceives, think he has a good reputation and has an honest name amongst the innocent folk that are daily being ripped off by his scam advert? I think he does!
Is an advert that tricks, misleads, and deceives a truthful advert? Yes it is. But it tells the truth in such a way that it tricks, misleads and deceives the people that read it. The advert looks creditable when only showing winners. It only becomes hugely uncreditable when the countless losers are occasionaly exposed as at the top of the page!
Is an advert that boasts, gloats, and brags about winners only and hides the never to be seen losers, an advert that is humble, plain and unadorned. I think not!
Is an advert that tricks, misleads and deceives an advert that is archaic, chaste, and virtuous? I don’t know wot that lot means! But I expect the answer is:- I think not!
But I know what this last lot means!!! Is an advert that tricks, misleads and deceives honorable in principles, intentions, and actions; upright and fair?!!!!!!!!! ...What do you think?
An example of the word HONEST used as an adjective could be “I thought he was an honest person”
--------------------------------------------
THOUGHT FOR THE DAY (19th Jan)
DECENCY
It is written within the scriptures of Ofcom that “The code of practice for premium rate services and 090 numbers is designed to set and maintain standards aimed at ensuring decency and honesty of such services”
Now let me explain the meaning of the word….. DECENCY.
DECENCY means:- conformity to the recognized standards of decent or proper behavior …. good taste …. modesty …. behaviour that is good, moral and acceptable in society
Does an advert that intentionally misleads and deceives by omission conform to the recognised standard of proper behaviour? I think not!
Is an advert that intentionally misleads and deceives by omission in “good taste?” I think not!
Is an advert that gloats, shouts, brags and boasts winners only and never mentions losers a modest advert? I think not!
Is an advert that misleads, tricks and deceives, an advert that is good, moral and acceptable in society? I think not!
An example of the 'Decency' word used as an adjective could be “I thought he was a decent person”
Think about it
----------------------------------------
THOUGHT FOR THE DAY (18th Jan)
THE RACING POST WITH ITS STINKING - SCAM - TRICK -MISLEADING - FRAUDULENT - DECEPTIVE - SWINDLING - FILTHY - OBSCENE 090 'RACKET' TIPPING SERVICE ADVERTS, IS AN ABSOLUTE INSULT TO THE INTELLIGENCE OF ITS READERS.
That's why I stopped buying it 2 years ago because I felt it was mocking, laughing, taking the 'P' and insulting my intelligence .........TRUE!
Think about it!
----------------------------------------
THOUGHT FOR THE DAY (17th Jan)
OBSCENE JOURNALISM
Took me daily stroll across the dales to me friendly bookie geezer to read The Beano.....oops sorry I mean Racing Post (can't tell the difference these days) Like their website!
Strrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrroooooooooooooooooooooooth!!!!!!
What the hell's going on!!!!..... Who and where have all this lot come from!!!.....There was all sorts of geezers all over the place struggling to get in me bookie pals betting shop......There were grannies....there were young lads .....there were young girls .... farm workers ..... housewives and all sorts of nice people struggling to get in.
I did not want to risk being crushed so nipped round the back of the shop and let me self in.
Strrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrooooooooooooooooooooooth!!!!
"Whats all these new machines for Bert? What happened to the old ones that wuz in here yesterday?"
"Burnt out Gerry!!!"
"Burnt out Bert???? What do you mean burnt out?" I said
"Overload?" replied Bert....."yep Gerry. Overloaded and over worked. They literally self destructed because they could not keep up with the demand. So I had to replace them with this new lot. And at the rate its going, I think this lot will only last a few days"
"But why Bert? Why the sudden rush to blow dough on FOBT's all of a sudden?"
"Well Gerry. As you know, in general The Racing Post is the bookies pal. Well bookie business has been slack of late coz of the credit crunch and stuff. Well The Racing Post decided to help us out by promoting FOBT's and anything not to do with proper horse racing. And krist Gerry, it's gone bloody mad"
"But what about taking bets on proper horse racing Bert. Are you still doing that?"
Well we might put something up for the Derby Gerry, but after this massive show of interest in FOBT's, thanks to the RP, we are now really ripping off geezers big time, so why bother with horse racing?"
"Wow Bert...Wow!!!....Wots yer next move Bert?"
Were going to ask the Racing Post to run a campaign for betting shops to have a licence for 10 FOBT's"...And I think they may do it.
"Wow Bert....Wow!!.....The Racing Post done you a big favour when it told geezers they could make easy money without actually betting on horses. All they need do is to come in your shop and play the machines and get rich!"
They sure did Gerry......They sure did"
"Oy Bert!!!!.....What was the name of the Racing Post geezer that told the gullable and the vulnerable that the road to Eldorado was via a FOBT terminal?"
His name Gerry was
ALLISTER DOWN!!!!!!!!
UNBELIEVABLY BAD JOURNALISM- DISGUSTING JOURNALISM - INSANE JOURNALISM - IRRESPONSIBLE JOURNALISM - OBSCENE JOURNALISM - MISLEADING JOURNALISM..... THEN IT WAS A JOURNALIST THAT WORKS FOR THE RACING POST....THE BOOKIES PAL.
But then what does one expect from a racing comic like the Racing Post?
"Oy Bert!!!"
"Wot"
"What if Gamcare hear about this?"
"TOOTHLESS TIGERS GERRY.....TOOTHLESS TIGERS.....A BUNCH OF POWDER PUFFS!!!"
Think about it!
"Well you know our pal Allister Down, the 'bookies pal' we call him, well he done an article which promoted FBT's in betting shops....He showed that simple people like that lot yu see outside can make BIG BIG MONEY on FBT's..... Us bookies do love him, he is so kind and nice to us"
"But these nice vulnerable people will not win Bert.....They will only beco
Wot t
.
THOUGHT FOR THE DAY (16th Jan)
DAVID NEVISON...A BLOODY BAD TIPPING SERVICE!
I had much respect for Nevison....But I haven't now.....I had respect for him when he was running his advert WITHOUT GLOATING ABOUT 'WINNERS ONLY'.....A breath of fresh air to the stinking world of scam 090 tipping operators
BUT!.......What do you call a tipster who runs an advert that only shows winners and conceals his losers and takes money from people by so doing ......Answer = Derek Thompson!
What do you call a tipster who MISLEADS people by only presenting people with winners and concealing his losers and taking money from them for so doing....Answer....Derek Thompson
What to you call a tipster who manufactures fraudulent adverts that MISLEAD TRICK AND DECEIVE and takes money from gullible people by so doing......Answer Derek Thompson........."etc etc etc, and much much more" as the scam-ad man would say!
Question....... What is the difference as regards the selling of manufactured scam-ad tips between Derek Thompson and David Nevison? ...... They are both doing exactly the same thing.....They are both ripping off the public by peddling scam adverts that only show winners and never the losers. And for that trick they are both getting very well rewarded with ill gotten gains.....Dave Nevisons advert today:-
""A bloody good tipping service.
DAVE NEVISON
Recent winners inc
Prosecco 5-1, Kia Kaha 5-4, Safe Breaker 5-6
Theatre Bell 14-1 e/w 2nd.
Phone now for today’s professional opinion"
Exactly the same as yesterday.....Just like the master con man himself Derek Thompson, repeat and repeat winners only.... The scam-ad con man No1, taught you well Nevison
WOT NO LOSERS?...Just like the master con man himsel....Derek Thompson!!!
Question......Why does Nevison not show his losers in his advert.....theres plenty of space for them?
Final question.....As far as premium rate scam tipsters go, what is the difference between Derek Thompson and David Nevison.....On that issue alone, they are both the same. Both rip off Joe Public in exactly the same way...... by the fraudulent marketing of defective goods.
I sez it az I seez it, alway 'ave done, always will do.
Think about it
-----------------------------------.
THOUGHT FOR THE DAY (15th Jan)
DAVE NEVISON..... A BLOODY BAD TIPPING SERVICE!
It was good for a few weeks.....now its gone BAD. Nevison is now about as low in my opinion as Derek Thompson......Nevison started up an 090 tipping line (don’t they all?) about 3 weeks ago....It was a nice clean pure and proper 090 premium rate service....NOT A GLOATING WINNER ONLY SITE!......Good luck to this geezer I thought!!....At last, a decent tipster with no scam-ad ‘winners only’ splattered all over his advert..
ALL CHANGE......The temptation to join in Derek Thompson ‘WINNER ONLY’ (never a loser)club was just to great....Nevison wanted part of the scam-ad action with his ‘winners only’.....Today I saw with much regret his advert....his scam Thompson look-a-like advert.. It read as follows
"A bloody good tipping service.
DAVE NEVISON
Recent winners inc
Prosecco 5-1, Kia Kaha 5-4, Safe Breaker 5-6
Theatre Bell 14-1 e/w 2nd.
Phone now for today’s professional opinion"
WOT NO LOSERS NEVISON?...Just like Thompson!!!
Misleading by omission (don’t they all) .... trickery.....deceiving ....and a fraudulent advert......From being good stuff, Dave Nevison now ranks with the worst of 090 trick tipsters.....Derek Thompson
DAVE NEVIDSON (winners only! Never a loser)
A BLOODY BAD AND MISLEADING TIPPING SERVICE!!!
Just like Derek Thmpson’s.......Tell us yer losers (every day!!!!!)Nevison and I might change me mind ......And pigs might fly.
----------------------------------
THOUGHT FOR THE DAY (14th Jan)
Derek Thompson charges approximately £6 per day to give his 090 clients the names of five or six horses. He takes about 6 minutes and charges you £1 per minute to do so ......You and I could do it in less than a minute
But Aaaaah! Thompson has “inside information from the gallops at HQ” and he feels that you should know all about it. He waffles and waffles and waffles and waffles....He goes on and on and on and on. Waffle - waffle - waffle - waffle....THE TRICK!!!! And all the time he’s waffling he’s taking a pound a minute out of your pocket......The CATCH!
The useless and worthless waffle costs you £5 to listen to. At the end of it you start feeling sick.....And then he gives you the names of the horses..... So how much is the waffle worth .....to you......and him?
Well let’s take a look at his waffling performance for November. It reads as follows (to a £5 stake)
Thompson's winning days were
£9, £12, £24, £7, £6, £14, £8.
Thompson's losing days were:-
- £26, - £31, - £8, - £36, - £8, - £23, - £8, - £11, - £7, - £31, - £15, - £16, - £36, - £22, - £36, - £18, - £26, - £26, - £21, - £28, - £6, - £2
Each day/result figure contains £5 worth of waffle (at least!) ..... That equates to 29 x 5 = £145.........You pay at least £145 to listen to pure proven crap talk per month. And it could all have been said in less than 1 minute per day....THE CON!!!!
But let’s be fair. What reward did you receive for paying for and listening to 145 minutes of crap talk which cost you £145........ Well take a look at his day results that I have listed above....And one word comes to mind
CON – CON – CON – CON – CON – CON – CON – CON and CON AGAIN!!
Think about it!!!
----------------------------------------
THOUGHT FOR THE DAY (13th Jan)
Extract from PhonepayPlus (the 090 regulator) website
"Premium Rate Telephone Services are products or services that are charged to your landline or mobile account. They include:- "
"Ringtones, games and other downloads for your mobile phone
Using your phone or the red button to vote or interact with TV programmes
Entering competitions
News, weather or goal alerts.
Phoning a directory enquiries company.
Chat and dating services.
Horoscopes.
Helplines"
Can you spot the one that’s missing. ....... The one that’s missing is the one that vulnerable people require much protection from. ........Yet the 090 regulator appears not to know of its existence. ....... But the government take and make millions via its associated taxes.
The one that is missing from the PPP list is of course, 090 tipping adverts. ...... Who cares about that not nice stuff called gambling? ........ If vulnerable people get ripped off by being stupid enough to believe what they read in misleading and fraudulent adverts...... it serves ‘em right!!
I say, has the gambler got no rights? .......... Vulnerable people that get sucked into responding to scam tipping adverts that gloat winners only, pay approx £6 per day (£2,100 per year) for worthless information. ..... And it would appear that the PPP (the 090 regulator) do not even know 090 tipping lines exist.
IT COSTS £2,100 PER YEAR TO PHONE DEREK THOMPSON’S FRAUDULENT 090 TIPPING LINE
How much do vulnerable people have to pay DEREK THOMPSON before they realise they have been conned by a fraudster operating a mega slick tipping scam?
Think about that.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
'
THOUGHT FOR THE DAY (12th Jan)
I notice with interest that Jim Mcgrath has resigned from Timeform.
In the Racing Post, ‘The Fat One,’ the gentleman who picks his nose and eats what he finds, as seen on TV BB, was quoted as saying ....... “I don’t think anyone will be able to come up with someone who has the experience going back to the foundling fathers as Jim did”....... Well maybe I can help out here Big Mac......... How about your old Channel 4 buddy Derek Thompson? ......I’m sure he could hide his dubious talents when applying for the position. Just like he hides his losers in his scam tipping adverts. Would he not be a suitable replacement for Jim McGrath? TalkSport speak very highly of him. I believe they call him a “RACING EXPERT” .........After all, Thompson has been a racing tipster for at least 20 years. A “foundling father”of fraudulent racing tipsters one might say!
I wonder if Jim Mcgrath knows that his Morning Line pal Derek Thompson operates an 090 fraudulent tipping line? ........ And I wonder if Big Mac knows that his Morning Line pal Derek Thompson operates an 090 fraudulent tipping line?...........If they do, they never say do they? .... I wonder why?
Just in case they don’t know that Derek Thompson is a fraud, I will tell them now ....... Jim and Big Mac, your bosom pal on Channel 4,.......
DEREK THOMPSON IS A FRAUD.
He takes money from vulnerable people via his fraudulent and misleading ‘winner only’ adverts.
Think about that lot!
---------------------------------------------------------------
.
THOUGHT FOR THE DAY (11th Jan)
PhonepayPlus (090 regulator) Code of Conduct. Extract
“In carrying out our mission, we are committed to the following:.... staying aware of, and responsive to, the ways in which consumers, or particular sets of consumers, may be vulnerable to harm when using premium rate services and striving to ensure that they receive the necessary protection,”........... NOW READ IT AGAIN!!!!
I would ask PPP (and I have):- Are they aware of the damage/"harm" that misleading and fraudulent 090 tipping advert/services do to the pockets of innocent and "vulnerable" people as a direct result of such "vulnerable" people responding to adverts that are designed and manufactured to mislead and deceive. Are not adverts that mislead and deceive by intent that gloat winners and conceal losers not..... fraudulent adverts? I say they are.
I would ask PPP (and I have) :- Are "vulnerable" people not being financially "harmed" by responding to fraudulent adverts that only show the ‘head’ of the coin when tossed and never the tail. As is the trick of the fraudulent 090 tipsters! I say they are.
I would ask PPP (and I have):- how are they "striving to ensure that vulnerable" racing folk, “a particular set of consumers” are receiving the “necessary protection” against fraudulent tipping advertisers that advertise their winners but conceal their losers.........
DEREK THOMPSON ... IS A FRAUDULENT RACING TIPSTER
-------------------------------------------------------------------
.
THOUGHT FOR THE DAY (10th Jan)
I notice that the Racing Post have been championing the cause of TV Racing. All the way to Downing Street I believe. Admirable. Most admirable!
Now how about The Racing Post (Trinity Mirror Group) championing the cause of the innocent and gullible punter who gets ripped off by con men and sheisters that peddle scam ‘winner only’ adverts in The Racing Post, every day of the week? I believe such scam adverts are called ‘advertorials’ whereby con men tipsters are not charged for their fraudulent adverts but instead, The Racing Post takes a cut of the ‘sucker money’ revenue.
If the Racing Post want the name of the most high profile con man advertiser within their newspaper, they need look no further than the con man who’s been publishing a fraudulent advert in their newspaper for the past 15 years. In 15 years this con man has shown thousands of winners and in 15 years this same con man has never shown just one of his tens of thousands of losers.
THE CON MAN'S NAME IS .............DEREK THOMPSON.
Think about it.
---------------------------------------------------------------
.
THOUGHT FOR THE DAY (9th Jan)
Question:- What is a FRAUDULENT ADVERT?
A FRAUDULENT ADVERT is an advert that tricks its reader into believing the product for sale is something that it is not. A tipping advert that shows 'winners only' and conceals the tipsters losses misleads the buyer because the buyer is denied (with intent) seeing the tipsters losers.
That is FRAUDULENT ADVERTISING
DEREK THOMPSON specialises in FRAUDULENT ADVERTISING
Think about it.
---------------------------------------------------------------.
THOUGHT FOR THE DAY (8th Jan)
Question:- What is a SCAM?
A SCAM is a confidence trick or a fraudulent scheme, especially for making a quick profit; A SCAM is a swindle
A racing tipster who advertises his winners and conceals his losers and takes money from people under false pretences is operating a SCAM. .....He is also a SWINDLER......He is also a CONFIDENCE TRICKSTER.....For the purpose of making a quick profit he swindles, tricks, deceives and misleads people.
I know a racing tipster who only shows his winners and never shows his losers.
I know a racing tipster who cons, swindles, misleads, deceives and tricks people to make himself AND OTHERS a 'long term' quick profit.............................. A SCAM.
HIS NAME IS DEREK THOMPSON.
---------------------------------------------------------------
.
THOUGHT FOR THE DAY (7th Jan)
Decent and honest people who do not know the man behind the mask all love Tommo. He’s cuddly and so nice! Grannies love him. Ho ho ho! Fellow associates that know of his 090 scams patronise him, but say nout. Such people know that his 090 PRS number is ripping the public off rotten, but say nout. “Tommo” is a name that is associated with the jollities of racing. There is no better front man than Thompson for the professional racing hypocrites that patronise him. And what about the poor guys who Thomson seduces every day with his sewer scraping scam ads. Who cares about them? And do they ever complain? No!! Why? Well it was only a fiver……….SCAM!
Think about it!
------------------------------------------------------------------.
THOUGHT FOR THE DAY (6th Jan)
Question:- What is a FRAUD?
Answer:- A fraud is a deception made for personal gain. I would ask Of-com, is not the taking of money from people (the personal gain) by publishing adverts that only show winners and never the losers (the deception) ....not a fraud?
DEREK THOMPSON COMMITS DECEPTION FOR PERSONAL GAINDEREK THOMPSON IS A FRAUD.
Think about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------
THOUGHT FOR THE DAY (5th Jan)
Question:- What is a CON MAN?A CON MAN IS A SWINDLER. A con man/swindler is a person who exploits the confidence of his innocent victims. A CON MAN tipster is also an immoral person. He peddles and deals in 'winners only' adverts. He conceals his losers from the victims that he exploits, and whose money he takes.
DEREK THOMPSON...............................IS A SWINDLER
Think about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
THOUGHT FOR THE DAY (4th Jan)
TalkSPORT dumped Jon Gaunt on moral grounds
TalkSPORT dumped Rod Lucas on moral grounds
Derek Thompson makes money and takes money from people by operating a SCAM 090 tipping line. Derek Thompson takes money from people by trickery and deception. Derek Thompson tricks people into paying him money by only showing his winners. Derek Thompson deceives people by never showing his losers.
THAT MAKES DEREK THOMPSON.............A CON MAN.
TalkSPORT dumped Jon Grant and Rod Lucas on moral grounds.
I wonder if talkSPORT know that:-
DEREK THOMPSON IS AN IMMORAL PERSON?
Think about it!
----------------------------------------------------------------
.
THOUGHT FOR THE DAY (3rd Jan)
TalkSPORT dumped Jon Gaunt on moral grounds
TalkSPORT dumped Rod Lucas on moral grounds
TalkSPORT employ the services of Derek Thompson who makes and takes money from people by feeding them misleading information
That makes .......DEREK THOMPSON .......... A CON MAN
Question:-
Why have talkSPORT dumped Jon Gaunt on moral grounds?
Why have talkSPORT dumped Rod Lucas on moral grounds?
And why have talkSPORT
NOT DUMPED DEREK THOMPSON ON MORAL GROUNDS?
THINK ABOUT THAT ONE!
-----------------------------------------------------------------
.
THOUGHT FOR THE DAY (2nd Jan)
What do you call a man who takes money from people by feeding them misleading information?
Answer................................................A CON MAN
DEREK THOMPSON IS A CON MAN
--------------------------------------------------------------
.
THOUGHT FOR THE DAY (1st Jan)
What do you call a man who takes money from people by showing them his winners and concealing his losers?
Answer......... A CON MAN
DEREK THOMPSON .................IS A CON MAN
------------------------------------------------------------------
I wonder if:-
The Racing Post
Channel 4
Talk Sport
At The Races
And OLBG
know that Derek Thompson is a con man who takes money from people by only showing his winners and concealing his losers?
Think about it!
.
No comments:
Post a Comment